Skip to main content

Designing Folding Cartons for EPR – Practical Engineering Levers That Reduce Reporting Complexity

Designing Folding Cartons for EPR


Designing Folding Cartons for EPR

Practical Engineering Levers That Reduce Reporting Complexity

EPR packaging programs reward clarity and punish ambiguity. If your folding carton design creates hidden components,
inconsistent weights, or uncontrolled variants, your packaging material reporting requirements get harder,
and your exposure to eco-modulated fees rises. This guide explains how to engineer
design for EPR packaging so your folding carton recyclability design stays simple to report, easy to verify, and cheaper to administer.
1,
2
Updated for 2026 operating reality in North America and Europe. Sources include Sustainable Packaging Coalition and government EPR reporting guidance.
1,
3

This Article at a Glance

  • Design for EPR packaging starts with stable, component-level bills of materials and verified weights.
  • Folding carton recyclability design improves when windows, laminations, and inserts are minimized or tightly controlled.
  • Packaging material reporting requirements depend on weight-by-material discipline, not assumptions.
  • Reducing material variety and preventing spec drift lowers administrative burden and audit risk.
  • The most reliable way to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure is to simplify structure before it becomes a reporting exception.

If your carton architecture is controlled, your reporting becomes predictable.

What EPR Changes for Folding Cartons

EPR shifts packaging decisions into reporting discipline. Your folding carton is no longer “paperboard packaging.”
It is a set of components, weights, and classifications that must stay stable across SKUs, plants, and suppliers.

Most EPR programs require obligated companies to join a producer responsibility organization, report packaging data, and pay fees that scale with the packaging they supply into market.
When fees are eco-modulated, recyclability and design choices can increase or decrease what you pay.
2,
1

For compliance teams, packaging material reporting requirements are fundamentally weight and material based. Government reporting guidance is explicit: report the weight of individual materials, and treat multi-material and composite structures as a classification problem that must be consistently applied.
3

That is why folding carton recyclability design is also a data design problem.
The easiest way to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure is to remove avoidable complexity before it becomes a reporting exception you manage forever.
4

Define the objective: fewer exceptions, cleaner reporting

If your packaging program has thousands of SKUs, EPR does not fail because you lack good intent.
It fails because small packaging changes accumulate. Windows change, coatings change, weights drift, vendors substitute.
Over time, you lose a defensible packaging bill of materials, and your reports become estimates.

The engineering goal is clear. Use design for EPR packaging to keep carton structures classifiable, separable, and measurable.
This is the fastest path to lower administrative burden and better fee forecasting.


Practical Engineering Levers for EPR-Ready Folding Cartons

These are the carton design variables that most often create reporting exceptions. Fix them at the structural level,
and your packaging material reporting requirements become repeatable.

EPR reporting is simplest when a folding carton is predominantly fiber and the non-fiber elements are either minimal, separable, or consistently specified.
Design-for-recycling guidance for paper and paperboard highlights the same theme across markets, reduce problematic combinations, limit non-paper components, and avoid structures that break pulping or screening performance.
5,
6

If your goal is to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure, the same levers also influence eco-modulated fee outcomes where recyclability and material choices are scored or priced differently.
1

Lever 1: Windows

Windowed cartons: design for separation and documentation

A plastic window turns “paperboard packaging” into a multi-component structure. That is not automatically non-compliant.
It becomes a reporting problem when the window film and adhesive are not tracked as explicit components.

  • Keep windows as small as performance allows.
  • Prefer designs where the window is removable or clearly separable at end-of-life.
  • Specify film type, gauge, and adhesive in the packaging bill of materials.

Composite classification rules and thresholds vary by jurisdiction. Government reporting guidance shows how small plastic fractions can change how fiber-based packs are classified and reported.
3

Lever 2: Laminations

Lamination control: avoid permanent multi-layer stacks

Laminations and barrier films can degrade fiber recoverability and create “what exactly is this” reporting debates.
Paper recyclability guidance flags certain coatings and laminated structures as conditional or limited compatibility,
depending on composition and local processing capability.
6

  • Use coatings aligned with fiber recovery where barrier performance allows.
  • If a laminate is required, lock material spec and thickness, then treat it as a permanent reportable component.
  • Avoid unannounced vendor substitutions, especially for “equivalent” films.

The reporting risk is often not the laminate itself, it is uncontrolled variation across SKUs and suppliers.

Lever 3: Material variety

Reduce component count and material variety

Every extra material, insert, liner, or coating increases classification work and verification time.
Design guidance for paper and paperboard emphasizes limiting non-paper components that can disrupt recycling operations.
5

  • Eliminate rigid inserts where paperboard engineering can replace them.
  • Standardize board grades across size families.
  • Keep adhesives and coatings consistent across the platform.
Lever 4: Weight

Lightweight without creating fragility exceptions

Fee calculations often scale with reported weight. Even when a program does not publish fee mechanics publicly, internal cost allocation usually tracks mass by material.
Lightweighting is only useful if it is controlled and documented, otherwise weights drift and reporting credibility falls.

  • Right-size cartons to reduce void and unnecessary board area.
  • Optimize caliper based on compression and distribution needs.
  • Use consistent conversion specs so weights stay stable over time.

EPR guidance consistently frames reporting as weight-by-material discipline, not estimates.
3

Lever 5: Eco-modulation

Engineer toward lower-fee outcomes where eco-modulation applies

Eco-modulation adjusts producer fees based on packaging attributes such as recyclability and other performance factors.
That means design decisions can change your fee position, not just your sustainability narrative.
1,
4

  • Prefer fiber-forward solutions with minimal non-fiber add-ons.
  • Document rationale for any non-fiber component that remains.
  • Keep the platform stable so performance claims and reporting stay defensible.

Quick diagnostic: where reporting breaks first

  • “Same carton” across SKUs, but different calipers, coatings, or windows.
  • A barrier film is added for shelf life, but the BOM and weights never update.
  • Artwork teams approve a new finish, and compliance never sees it.
  • Multiple suppliers produce “equivalent” cartons with different materials.

The fix is not a spreadsheet heroics cycle. The fix is controlled carton engineering and controlled data.


Data Structure and Audit Readiness for EPR Packaging

EPR compliance work accelerates when packaging data is SKU-based, component-based, and version-controlled.
That is how you turn folding carton packaging into report-ready material supply data.

Most EPR regimes converge on the same operational requirement, report packaging by material and weight, then maintain evidence that supports what you submitted.
Government guidance is explicit about weight-by-material reporting and how to treat composite and multi-material packaging in submissions.
3

In the United States, EPR packaging programs are moving from concept into compliance cycles across multiple states. That increases multi-jurisdiction complexity and raises the value of a single packaging system of record.
7

1

Build a packaging bill of materials that matches reality

Treat each folding carton as a component structure, paperboard, coatings, window film, adhesives, inserts.
The BOM should reflect what is physically supplied, not what the template spec says.
EPR reporting guidance repeatedly ties compliance to material and weight discipline.
3

Outcome: fewer classification debates and fewer “unknown material” exceptions.

2

Store weights at the component level, then roll up

If a carton has a window, you need the paperboard weight and the window weight.
Some EPR guidance examples show this pattern across materials, each material weight rolls into its category for reporting.
4

Outcome: better fee modeling and cleaner verification support.

3

Apply change control to packaging, like you would to a formula

When a coating, laminate, board grade, or window film changes, your EPR reporting should update with it.
Multi-state and multi-market timelines make “silent packaging drift” more expensive to correct later.
7

Outcome: defensible audit trails and fewer retroactive data fixes.

Lower reporting complexity

Controlled carton platform

  • Fewer board grades across the range
  • Coatings standardized by category
  • Window use limited and consistently specified
  • Weights verified and version-controlled

This structure makes design for EPR packaging operational. Your folding carton recyclability design stays stable,
and your packaging material reporting requirements become repeatable.

Higher reporting complexity

Exception-driven carton portfolio

  • Multiple finishes chosen SKU by SKU with no governance
  • Window films substituted by vendor availability
  • Weights guessed or copied from legacy specs
  • No linkage between artwork approvals and BOM updates

This is where teams lose audit readiness, and where fee exposure becomes unpredictable when eco-modulation applies.
1

Where Netpak fits: engineering plus documentation

Netpak manufactures custom folding cartons and windowed boxes, and supports structural design, prepress, printing, finishing, and logistics.
That matters for EPR because a controlled packaging supplier can keep structures stable and documentation consistent across runs and variants.
8,
9

  • Structure and prepress discipline: CAD, prototyping, and dieline control to reduce uncontrolled variation.9
  • Material transparency: board selection, windowing options, coatings, and finishing captured in specs.8
  • Quote inputs that match reporting needs: cartons priced around specs, volumes, and timelines, with clear material and finishing definitions that support internal reporting workflows.9

If your goal is to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure and reporting labor, start by stabilizing carton architecture and packaging data in the same project.



Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions from packaging engineers and compliance leaders aligning folding carton programs with EPR reporting.

What does EPR reporting require for folding cartons?

EPR programs generally require producers to report packaging supplied by material category and weight. That creates a downstream need for
SKU-level bills of materials, controlled component weights, and documented material classifications. Ontario’s Blue Box program, for example,
requires producers to register and report supply data by defined material categories.
1,
2

For folding cartons, reporting failures usually come from undocumented windows, laminations, coating changes, or outdated weight assumptions.

Do windows and laminations affect recyclability reporting?

They can. Recyclability guidance for paper packaging cautions against composite structures that are difficult to separate in fiber recovery systems.
Even when a carton is predominantly paperboard, window films, barrier layers, and laminations often require explicit tracking and classification
within your packaging material reporting requirements.
3

How do you reduce EPR fees through folding carton design?

While fee structures differ by jurisdiction, common levers include reducing total material weight supplied, improving recyclability alignment,
and simplifying multi-material structures. EPR resources consistently link packaging reduction and recyclability improvements to lower cost exposure.
4

Practically, that means fiber-forward design, minimized non-fiber components, standardized board grades, and verified component weights.

What does “audit ready” packaging data look like?

Audit-ready packaging data is version-controlled, traceable to specifications, and aligned to what is physically supplied.
It includes a SKU-linked bill of materials, documented material categories, and current component weights. Supply reporting guidance emphasizes
weight-by-material discipline, which increases the importance of packaging data governance.
2

Request an EPR-Ready Folding Carton Quote

If you are redesigning folding cartons to reduce reporting complexity, send Netpak your dielines,
board grades, finishing specifications, window details, and annual volumes by SKU.
We will respond with structured engineering options that support clean packaging material reporting requirements and audit readiness.


Request a Quote

Prefer email, send SKU specs and timelines to
sales@netpak.com.


Continue reading

Ontario Blue Box EPR After January 1, 2026: What Food Brands and Packaging Teams Need for Folding Cartons

Ontario Blue Box EPR - Netpak Packaging

Ontario Blue Box EPR
After January 1, 2026

What Food Brands and Packaging Teams Need for Folding Cartons

Ontario’s Blue Box EPR system is live across the province. Producers now fund and run residential recycling.
If you sell food in Ontario using folding carton packaging, your compliance depends on accurate supply reporting,
defensible material category decisions, and packaging governance that stays stable across SKUs and co packers.
1
Updated for post transition operations in 2026. Sources include RPRA and Circular Materials.
1,
2

What “Compliance” Means Under Ontario Blue Box EPR

For producers, Ontario Blue Box EPR compliance is operational.
It links the Blue Box Regulation, RPRA registry and supply reporting, and your packaging bill of materials across every SKU and channel.

If you run packaging for a Canadian or cross border food portfolio, Ontario’s extended producer responsibility model creates a measurable system.
Producers register, report packaging supply, and operate within defined compliance frameworks that reference material categories and reporting expectations.
1

Folding cartons sit inside the highest volume packaging workflows for food.
Paper based packaging and cartons are explicitly included in Ontario’s resident recycling guidance, which reflects the materials moving through the system at scale.
3

What changed after January 1, 2026

Under the transition, Ontario moved responsibility for residential Blue Box services away from municipalities and toward producers.
Circular Materials describes this shift as part of the enhanced Blue Box program and provides province wide resident service information and program guidance.
2

Your risk is rarely the carton itself. Your risk is unmanaged variation. SKU by SKU material drift, inconsistent weights, and ad hoc artwork changes create reporting weakness that becomes visible in verification cycles.


What Applies Now in 2026

Ontario’s Blue Box EPR system is operating province wide. Your packaging obligations are set by supply data.
Your risk is driven by how well you can quantify packaging by material category, weight, and brand structure.

In 2026, the practical question is not whether you support recycling. The practical question is whether your packaging program produces defensible data.
Ontario’s oversight authority, RPRA, requires obligated producers to register and report supply data through its Registry, including the weight of Blue Box material supplied to Ontario consumers in the previous calendar year and the brands included in the supply report.
4

RPRA also issues producer guidance on verification and reporting. For many organizations, this shifts EPR from a sustainability line item into a finance and operations discipline.
Your packaging specifications, your ERP data, and your artwork workflow now connect directly to regulated reporting.
1

Producer scope

Start with the producer definition

O. Reg. 391/21 defines who is obligated. Many brands assume the manufacturer holds the obligation.
In practice, obligation depends on who supplies the packaged product to Ontario consumers and on the specific producer hierarchy in the regulation.
5

If your products are sold through multiple channels, your obligation mapping should be done per channel and per brand family.

Reporting mechanics

Supply reporting drives obligations

RPRA’s supply reporting guidance focuses on weight by Blue Box material category and brand lists.
This means a carton program that lacks current weights and component detail will create either under reporting risk or cost inflation.
4

In most organizations, packaging weights live in too many places. EPR forces consolidation.

Verification timing

Verification expectations are staged

RPRA has stated that Blue Box producers are not required to submit a verification report when submitting supply reports in 2025 and 2026.
RPRA also states producers will submit their first supply data verification report in 2027 to verify 2026 supply data.
6,
1

The absence of a 2026 verification submission does not reduce the value of strong audit trails. It increases the payoff of building them early.

Why folding cartons create blind spots in EPR reporting

Cartons look simple because they are fibre. Portfolios are not simple. Reporting breaks when packaging teams treat cartons as one uniform material stream.
RPRA’s compliance materials emphasize that producers must report supply data in defined material categories, and those categories contain sub rules that depend on use case and format.
7

  • One SKU family has multiple board calipers across sizes, but only one weight is stored.
  • A carton uses a plastic window or liner. The bill of materials does not track it.
  • A foil or barrier feature was added for shelf life. Reporting never changed.
  • A co packer changed glue, varnish, or laminate. Packaging documentation never updated.

Under EPR, these are not minor errors. These are errors that propagate into producer obligations and financial planning.

What a Controlled EPR Packaging System Looks Like

For packaging teams, Blue Box EPR becomes manageable when you treat cartons like controlled parts.
You track the component structure and weight with the same discipline you apply to a formula change.

1

Lock a packaging bill of materials per SKU

Store carton board, coating, laminate, and add ons as explicit components. Tie each to a material category decision.
Use one system of record so packaging, compliance, and finance reference the same numbers.
4

2

Verify weights from dielines and production specs

The weight you report is not a guess. It is a quantification exercise tied to actual packaging supplied.
Reconcile dieline area and board caliper to production realities, including waste factors and versioning controls.
4

3

Build change control around packaging updates

Packaging changes happen for cost, supply, shelf life, and marketing. Blue Box EPR requires the reporting layer to change in sync.
Track when a new structure goes live by facility and by channel so supply data remains defensible.
5

What to do first if you have a large SKU count

Do not start by trying to perfect everything. Start by removing the biggest cost and compliance drivers.
In most portfolios, a small subset of SKUs drives most carton tonnage and most hybrid carton complexity.

  • Rank SKUs by annual carton volume into Ontario.
  • Flag hybrid cartons, windows, liners, foil, metallized barriers, rigid inserts.
  • Confirm weights from current dielines and board specs.
  • Confirm brand lists and ownership mapping for reporting outputs.4

Once you have the top 20 percent of SKUs stabilized, the remaining portfolio becomes a repeatable process.

Where Netpak fits

Most EPR friction comes from missing packaging facts. Netpak reduces that friction by producing the carton and the documentation together.
You get a packaging partner that can tie structure, material selection, and artwork execution into one controlled output.

  • Carton material transparency, including board and finishing choices.
  • Dieline based weight inputs you can use for internal reporting workflows.
  • Change control discipline, so packaging updates do not bypass compliance data.

Carton Design Decisions That Affect EPR Exposure

Blue Box EPR regulates supply data and material categories. Your carton structure determines how complex that reporting becomes.

Folding cartons are typically reported as paper packaging in Ontario’s Blue Box system.
Fibre packaging performs well in residential recycling streams and remains one of the most established materials in curbside programs.

Complexity increases when cartons include windows, laminations, barrier films, or rigid inserts.
Under O. Reg. 391/21, producers report material supplied by category.
Your classification logic must be documented and repeatable.

Lower complexity

Fibre forward carton platform

  • High fibre content board
  • Minimal or no plastic window
  • Coatings aligned with fibre recovery
  • No permanently attached rigid inserts

These structures align clearly with paper packaging reporting.
Internal classification logic becomes simple and repeatable.

Higher complexity

Hybrid carton structures

  • Large plastic windows
  • Foil laminations
  • Multi layer polymer coatings
  • Composite integrated components

These features require clear documentation.
Without disciplined tracking, classification decisions drift and audit exposure increases.

Standardizing Carton Platforms Across Channels

Brands distribute across Ontario, Quebec, Western Canada, and the United States.
Platform fragmentation increases compliance work in every jurisdiction.

Ontario’s EPR framework is structured and data driven.
A packaging platform built differently for each region increases regulatory complexity without increasing consumer value.

A standardized folding carton architecture reduces three types of exposure.

Regulatory exposure

When one fibre based carton structure is used across markets, material classification logic travels with the design.
Compliance teams defend fewer interpretations.

Financial volatility

Blue Box EPR obligations derive from reported supply.
Consistent structures stabilize weight assumptions and allow forecasting based on
volume Ă— controlled carton weight.

Operational friction

Co packers, printers, and internal design teams perform better with fewer structural exceptions.
Each exception introduces a potential disconnect between packaging reality and reported data.

How Netpak supports platform discipline

Netpak works upstream in the packaging lifecycle.
We help brands define folding carton platforms that meet brand objectives and maintain reporting clarity.

  • Evaluate legacy hybrid structures and simplify where possible
  • Recommend fibre dominant alternatives when performance allows
  • Align dieline families across sizes to preserve reporting logic
  • Document board grades and finishing for compliance teams

Blue Box EPR becomes manageable when packaging architecture and reporting discipline move together.


Frequently Asked Questions

Questions we receive from regulatory, finance, and packaging leaders managing folding carton portfolios supplied into Ontario.

Does every folding carton sold in Ontario fall under Blue Box EPR?

Most residential consumer packaging supplied into Ontario, including paper based folding cartons, is captured under the Blue Box Regulation if you meet the definition of producer under O. Reg. 391/21.
Producer hierarchy becomes critical when brands are sold through multiple channels, private label structures, or shared distribution models.
5

Are producers required to submit verification reports in 2026?

RPRA has stated that Blue Box producers are not required to submit verification reports when submitting supply reports in 2025 and 2026.
RPRA also states producers will submit their first supply data verification report in 2027 to verify 2026 supply data.
6

Use the 2026 operating period to build audit trails, reconcile weights, and lock material category logic before formal verification begins.

How detailed does carton weight reporting need to be?

Producers must report weight supplied into Ontario by Blue Box material category and include brand lists as part of the reporting process.
Carton weights should reflect actual packaging supplied and be supported by specifications and internal documentation, not estimates carried forward from legacy specs.
4

Does adding a window, liner, or barrier layer change reporting?

Additional components can change how packaging is categorized and reported. Hybrid structures should be documented explicitly in the packaging bill of materials and tied to a written internal classification logic aligned to RPRA guidance and the Regulation.
7

Request a Folding Carton Quote for Ontario Supply

If you supply packaged food into Ontario, we can quote folding cartons with the
documentation discipline EPR reporting requires. Share your SKU list, dielines,
board grades, finishes, and annual volumes. We will respond with a structured
quote and a packaging path that supports defensible supply reporting.


Request a Quote


Continue reading

Canada Front of Package Nutrition Symbol 2026: Compliance Strategy for Folding Carton Food Packaging


Canada Front of Package
Nutrition Symbol 2026

Compliance Strategy for Folding Carton Food Packaging

Canada’s front of package nutrition symbol is mandatory for many prepackaged foods sold in Canada.
As of January 1, 2026, CFIA enforces compliance for foods imported, manufactured in Canada, or packaged at retail on or after that date.1

If you manage food packaging in folding cartons, this regulation affects your principal display panel, artwork approvals, and production planning.
The Canada FOP nutrition symbol is not a minor label update.
It changes front panel hierarchy, bilingual layout structure, and compliance governance.2

Food brands searching for Canada front of package nutrition symbol requirements, FOP nutrition symbol Canada 2026 enforcement,
or folding carton packaging compliance Canada need implementation clarity.

This article outlines what the regulation requires, where packaging programs fail, and how a folding carton partner such as Netpak supports structured compliance.

What CFIA will enforce.
Foods imported, manufactured in Canada, or packaged at retail on or after January 1, 2026 must comply.
Foods imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail before that date may continue to be sold under sell through provisions.
Your compliance trigger is the production and packaging date, not the retail sell through date.1

What the Official Canada FOP Nutrition Symbol Looks Like

Health Canada prescribes standardized black and white symbols. You must use official artwork formats and follow the presentation rules.2

High in Saturated Fat, Sugars, Sodium

FOP symbol high in saturated fat, sugars, sodium
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

High in Sodium

FOP symbol high in sodium
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

High in Saturated Fat and Sugars

FOP symbol high in saturated fat and sugars
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

High in Saturated Fat

FOP symbol high in saturated fat
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

Core presentation requirements that affect folding cartons

  • English and French text, using the official formats and language rules.2
  • Minimum size based on principal display surface area, using Health Canada size tables, not estimates.2
  • Required clear space around the symbol, treated as a locked zone in dielines.2
  • Placement in the upper half of the principal display panel, generally on the right half when the panel is wider than tall, consistent with Health Canada examples.2

From a folding carton perspective, these requirements affect dieline design. If your front panel is built around dense branding or multiple callouts, symbol integration often requires structural adjustment.

When the Canada Front of Package Nutrition Symbol Is Required

Health Canada sets nutrient thresholds based on percent Daily Value for saturated fat, sugars, and sodium.
Trigger logic depends on reference amount and category rules in the guidance.2

Most foods

Reference amount greater than 30 g or 30 mL.

Symbol required at 15 percent Daily Value or more.

Small reference amounts

30 g or 30 mL or less.

Symbol required at 10 percent Daily Value or more.

Main dishes

Reference amount 200 g or more for children and adults, or 170 g or more for products only for children 1 to 4, under the guidance criteria.

Symbol required at 30 percent Daily Value or more.

What goes wrong in real portfolios

You must assess each nutrient independently. If one nutrient meets or exceeds the threshold, the symbol is required.2

  • Incorrect reference amount classification across a SKU family.
  • Misinterpretation of main dish criteria across multi component products.
  • Failure to reassess after reformulation, especially sodium creep.
  • Overlooking 10 percent Daily Value triggers for small reference amounts.

Example. A 26 g snack with sodium at 11 percent Daily Value triggers the symbol under the 10 percent rule.
If your previous formula was 9 percent Daily Value and the carton had no symbol, a minor reformulation forces a front panel redesign.2

Treat FOP as a controlled change, not a one time artwork update.

January 1, 2026 Enforcement and Production Risk

CFIA ties compliance to when food is imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail. Sell through depends on the production side date, not the retail date.1

Three exposure scenarios for folding cartons

  • Cartons printed before 2026 but filled in 2026.
  • Co packers holding legacy packaging inventory beyond the year boundary.
  • Reformulated SKUs produced in 2026 without updated artwork and dielines.

If a product packaged in 2026 exceeds thresholds and the carton lacks the required symbol, corrective action follows CFIA enforcement.1

How to prevent carton scrap and line disruption

Treat the carton as a controlled component. Track three dates per SKU.

  • Artwork release date.
  • Print and delivery date.
  • First fill date.

Reverse schedule from the first fill date. Segregate legacy inventory. Require written changeover acceptance from co packers.

Structural Implications for Folding Carton Programs

The front of package symbol affects more than graphics. It affects the packaging system, not only the layout file.

What changes in a well run carton system

  • Front panel hierarchy becomes a template decision.
  • Multi SKU family alignment reduces repeated redesign across flavours and sizes.
  • Bilingual layout spacing becomes a structural rule.
  • Club pack principal display panels need consistent placement logic across faces.
  • Prepress QC includes symbol size, clear space, and orientation checks.
  • Inventory and print run forecasting aligns to first fill dates under CFIA date logic.1

Where programs fail

Decentralized SKU governance increases scrap and relabelling costs because thresholds and artwork changes do not move together.
Compliance needs repeatable control across functions.

  • Regulatory and R and D update nutrition data, packaging does not receive an automatic trigger review.
  • Design locks front panels without a reserved symbol zone.
  • Operations prints to forecast without tying cartons to first fill dates.
  • Co packers run legacy cartons in 2026 because the changeover plan is informal.

Placement examples, use these early in dieline planning

Wide PDP placement example
Wide principal display panel example from Health Canada guidance. Placement is shown within the upper half and typically in the right half when the panel is wider than tall.2

Tall PDP example

Tall PDP placement example

Upper half placement example from Health Canada guidance.2

Vertical symbol example

Vertical symbol example

Vertical orientation example from Health Canada guidance.2

Language and Display Options

The symbol has English, French, and bilingual format rules. Decide your approach early so the rule stays consistent across SKUs and faces.2

Bilingual symbol example

English first bilingual symbol example

English first bilingual example from Health Canada guidance.2

Bilingual symbol example

French first bilingual symbol example

French first bilingual example from Health Canada guidance.2

Health Canada allows equal principal display panels to carry language specific symbols on the matching language face in certain cases.
Plan this choice early because it affects hierarchy, spacing, and SKU family consistency.2

How Netpak Supports Folding Carton Compliance

Netpak approaches Canada FOP compliance as an integrated packaging governance process. The goal is repeatable execution across SKUs.
You reduce scrap, stabilize launch timelines, and keep artwork systems under control.

SKU level trigger validation

We confirm reference amounts and document trigger logic for saturated fat, sugars, and sodium per SKU, using Health Canada guidance as the baseline.2

Output: a SKU trigger map tied to your nutrition facts inputs.

Dieline and front panel assessment

We validate symbol size, clear space, and placement against your principal display panel geometry. We adjust dielines and layouts before art lock.2

Output: dieline impact notes with placement checks.

Reformulation risk mapping

We flag SKUs near threshold boundaries where a small nutrient shift changes symbol requirements. We prioritize items near 15 and 10 percent Daily Value triggers.2

Output: a risk band list for governance and planning.

Production cutover planning

We tie cartons to first fill dates and build a cutover plan aligned to CFIA’s enforcement trigger. This limits obsolete inventory and line disruption in 2026.1

Output: a cutover plan by SKU and facility.

Prepress compliance integration

We integrate symbol verification into artwork approvals, including size table checks, clear space locks, bilingual format control, and placement validation.2

Output: a repeatable prepress checklist for your team.

Quote and timeline inputs

We scope quickly when you share SKUs, current dielines, principal display panel dimensions, and first 2026 fill dates. Co packer sites and changeover dates tighten planning.1

Output: a scoped timeline and quote inputs checklist.

Sticker Labels, Assortments, and Front Panel Claim Guardrails

In store labels and assortment packs add operational complexity.
Front panel claims also face restrictions when the same nutrient appears in the symbol.
Treat these as separate workflow checkpoints in your packaging system.2

Scale label sticker example

Scale label sticker example

Sticker placement example from Health Canada guidance. Use adhesive that survives distribution and retail handling.2

Assortment pack example

Assortment pack example

Assortment example from Health Canada guidance. Decide whether one symbol applies across flavours or if the pack needs more than one presentation.2

Same nutrient claims

If a nutrient appears in the symbol, review whether front panel claims for that nutrient are restricted under the guidance.
Validate claim eligibility before you lock your front panel copy.2

Visibility and contrast

Keep the symbol high contrast and unobscured. Treat clear space as a locked zone in your dielines so brand elements do not creep into the buffer.2

Look alike seal risk

Avoid front panel marks that mimic the symbol’s structure. Treat this as a governance standard across agencies and co manufacturers.2

Download Official Specifications and Formats

Use Health Canada’s official files to avoid sizing, spacing, and language errors.
Treat these as your single source for symbol artwork and tables.2

Download the Directory of Specifications and Compendium of Formats from Health Canada’s front of package nutrition labelling resources.
Use these files in prepress to confirm minimum size and placement rules before plates are made.2

FAQ

These are common operational questions from packaging teams managing multiple SKUs and co packer sites.

Does every food product require the Canada front of package nutrition symbol?

No. The symbol is required when saturated fat, sugars, or sodium meet or exceed Health Canada’s percent Daily Value thresholds.
Assess each nutrient independently using the product’s reference amount and the guidance criteria.2

Are there exemptions or cases where the symbol is prohibited?

Yes. Health Canada defines category based exemptions and situations where the symbol is prohibited.
Confirm category conditions before you lock artwork, especially for products with specialized regulatory status.2

If my product was manufactured in December 2025 but sold in 2026, does it need the symbol?

CFIA ties compliance to foods imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail on or after January 1, 2026.
Foods imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail before that date may continue to be sold.
The key date is the production and packaging side date, not the retail sell through date.1

If I reformulate in 2026 and cross a nutrient threshold, do I need new cartons immediately?

Yes. If the reformulated product exceeds a threshold and is imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail on or after January 1, 2026, the required symbol must appear.
Align nutrition change control with carton artwork updates so the change reaches the line before the first fill date.12

How is minimum size determined for the symbol on a folding carton?

Minimum size is tied to the principal display surface area. Health Canada provides tables and format rules in the guide and related files.
For folding cartons, confirm the PDP geometry on the dieline, then apply the official size table before prepress release.2

What should I send Netpak to request a quote?

Share your SKU list, nutrition facts data, reference amounts, current dielines, principal display panel dimensions, and first fill dates by facility.
If applicable, include co packer sites and planned changeover timing.1

Request a Folding Carton FOP Quote

If you manage multiple SKUs and need support aligning folding carton artwork and production planning with Canada’s FOP nutrition symbol requirements, use the form below to request a quote.


Continue reading

Canadian Front of Package Nutrition Symbol 2026

Canadian Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbol 2026

Placement rules, design specs, and how Netpak safeguards your folding-carton launch.

Regulation at a Glance

Any pre-packaged food that exceeds thresholds for saturated fat, sugars, or sodium must carry Health Canada’s FOP symbol by 1 January 20261. Trigger levels are 15 % DV, 10 % DV for single-serves, and 30 % DV for large mains2.

Retailers already delist SKUs flagged as risky, and emergency relabels drain budgets3, 4.

Hidden Exemptions & Non-Eligible Foods

Full Exemptions

Plain produce, milk, yogurt, unseasoned meats, honey, maple syrup, salt, packs ≤ 30 cm², and minis <15 cm² surface avoid the symbol5.

Conditional Exemptions

Cheese, yogurt, kefir, buttermilk qualify when they meet the 2024 calcium minimum6.

Voluntary Symbol on Exempt Food

Allowed, but every Part B.01.352 dimension still applies2.

Symbol Prohibited

Infant formula, meal replacements, and other specialised diets may never bear the symbol2.

Transition & Enforcement Timeline

Three-Year Runway

Regs released 20 Jul 2022. Transition ends 31 Dec 20257.

Sell-Through

Product made or imported before 1 Jan 2026 may remain on shelf until depleted7.

CFIA Phased Inspections

Guidance 2023-2025, full audits 20267.

Let Netpak Handle Your 2026 FOP Packaging

Fill out this form to request full-service support for your FOP-compliant carton.


Request Packaging Support

Design Pitfalls That Trigger Re-Prints

Size Tables

Use the Directory tables. Guessing width fails audits2.

Buffer Zone

Clear space = x-height of Helvetica Neue in the symbol2.

Bar Order

Sat fat, Sugars, Sodium. Blank bars dropped only when PDS ≤ 30 cm²2.

Keep Text Upright

Symbol text stays parallel to the package base, even on angled labels2.

Irregular Shapes

Add a symbol to each selling face or brief merchandisers on orientation2.

Vertical vs Horizontal

Vertical symbol example

Bottle PDS ≤ 450 cm² forces vertical symbol2.

Language & Display Options

Bilingual Symbol

English-first bilingual

English-first

Bilingual Symbol

French-first bilingual

French-first

Two equal PDPs may show an English symbol on the English face and a French symbol on the French face2.

Sticker Labels & Visibility Rules

Scale-Label Sticker

Scale label example

FOP printed on an in-store scale label

Sticker allowed when normal placement impossible. Adhesive must endure distribution2.

Mandatory Visibility

Symbol must stay high-contrast and unobscured at all times2.

Assortments & Kits

Assortment example

Label shows one symbol per flavour

If all flavours trigger the same symbol, one instance on the PDP is enough2.

Front-Panel Claim Guardrails

Same-Nutrient Claims

“Low sodium,” “unsweetened,” etc. prohibited when the nutrient appears in the symbol2.

Size Cap

Other nutrient claims ≤ 2× symbol cap height2.

Look-Alike Seals

Check-marks or logos that mimic the symbol get refused at import2.

Download the Official Files

Grab vector files and dimension tables straight from Health Canada: the Directory of Specifications and Compendium of Formats5.

Four Core Symbol Formats

High in Sat Fat, Sugars, Sodium

Bilingual

High in Sodium

English

High in Sat Fat & Sugars

English

High in Sat Fat

Bilingual

Symbol Placement Examples

Wide PDP

Width > height, symbol in right half.

Tall PDP

Height ≥ width, symbol in upper half.

Cylindrical

Full upper half, 10 % buffer.

Cylindrical

Minimal cross-over only to meet buffer.

How Netpak De-Risks Your 2026 Launch

Turnkey Carton Manufacturing

Design, pre-press, printing, finishing, distribution, warehousing in one flow.

Compliance-Ready Dielines

Engineers lock PDP geometry and buffer zones before plates hit the press.

G7 & ISO 9001 Precision

G7 Master and ISO processes keep grey balance tight for razor-sharp symbols.

North American Capacity

Two Montréal plants plus US fulfilment slash lead times on both sides of the border.

Food-Safe Materials

BRCGS Packaging, FSC paper, and Health Canada-approved adhesives protect every certification.

Continue reading

The road to plastic-free packaging

As we move into the new decade, one of the most prominent conversations we are having is that of sustainability. Businesses are becoming more conscious of the environment on many levels, especially when it comes to packaging. But how can they produce ethical and eco-friendly packaging while keeping costs under control? We will examine some perfectly attainable options available that can reduce the use of plastic and be cost efficient. Don’t despair, you can save a few bucks while also saving a few ducks!

Plastic rose to prominence as a sturdier alternative to glass in the latter half of the 20th century. Its lightweight composition and resistance to breaking when dropped allowed it to become one of the most common packaging materials for a plethora of industries. However, plastic also has its disadvantages, as it doesn’t biodegrade quickly and eventually clogs landfills, oceans and animal habitats. Companies worldwide are moving to more sustainable packaging, such as paper, sugar-cane, and other alternatives.

Convert to paperboard packaging

Just to refresh your memory, paperboard is a thick paper-based material. This makes it ideal for protecting your products as it’s readily available in various thicknesses. However, for the purpose of this conversation, its most important feature is its biodegradability. Known to degrade quicker than plastic, it’s also a cost-effective option for your packaging.

Our team of procurement experts at Netpak can help source paperboards at an effective cost that fit right into your packaging standards, including recyclable boards. Learn more about the paperboards offered here.

Use biomaterials

We’ve all heard the expression “you are what you eat”. But did you ever think that what you eat can also be used as packaging material? Plant- and food-based materials are making headlines as cheap and degradable substitutes to plastic packaging. Some of the ones that are growing in popularity include sugarcane boards or boards made of tapioca root and cornstarch.

It doesn’t have to be a gruelling process to find an alternative to plastic-free packaging. It’s a small step for a business, but a giant leap for the environment. So, get on board with paperboard!

Netpak : Experts en boĂ®tes pliantes imprimĂ©es. Obtenez un devis : sales@netpak.com | CANADA – ÉTATS-UNIS 1-866-399-8544

UV coating: The touch that makes your folding carton shine

The finishing touch on your packaging project can make the whole difference in its success and overall aesthetics. Coatings not only protect your final product, but also gives it a higher-end and refined appearance. How do coatings actually work? Are there several types to choose from? Let’s take a closer look.

What is UV coating?

UV coating begins with the application of a wet compound on top of paper that is then dried by using ultraviolet light. Generally, any type of paperboard can have a UV coating applied to it! However, usually this technique works best with thicker paper. That’s what makes it ideal for packaging, especially in folding carton applications. You can even take it up a notch and customize the extent of reflectivity of your final packaging.

UV coating your marketing packaging initiatives can be very beneficial. As previously mentioned, the main reason for opting for this packaging technique is the aesthetics it brings to the table. It enriches your design and enhances the colors used. This leads to increased customer satisfaction as the packaging will have such a high-end look to it. Moreover, the process of UV coating also protects your packaging, and allows it to last longer. Now that’s a true return on investment!

UV coating is not a one trick pony. There are several types to choose from depending on the look you wish to accomplish. Two of the main ones we will be focusing on are Gloss UV coating and Matte Coating.

Gloss UV Coating

Just like the name suggests, gloss UV is all about the shine. If you are looking for packaging with a lot of sheen, this would be the option to go with. A word of warning however: make sure everything is still legible on the package and avoid over-glossing. This defeats the purpose of the process.

Matte UV Coating

Matte coating on the other hand is a satin finish that allows colors to look more vibrant and doesn’t leave fingerprints. Synonymous with elegance and luxury, this type of finish can be used in certain areas of the design to make them stand out from the rest.

No matter which type you use, if you are looking for a high-end look to your packaging, you can’t go wrong with UV coating. At Netpak, we have a variety of enhanced printing options to choose from for your packaging to make every project stand out more than you thought possible.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

Pure or Green: The battle between virgin and recycled board continues…

There is a dilemma that needs to be resolved, a truth that needs to be uncovered. It has to do with virgin vs recycled paperboard. Before we uncover the facts between these types of materials, let us take a closer look at the concept of paperboard itself. Paperboard is a thick paper that is more rigid than the normal one. Because of this, it’s one of the main materials used for packaging. There are two types of paperboard that are popular: virgin and recycled. But what sets each one apart and makes it the one you choose?

Virgin vs Recycled Paperboard

Let us first delve into virgin paperboard. Virgin paperboard is made from fibers that are derived from pine, spruce, birch and eucalyptus trees. These fibers make this type of paperboard strong yet lightweight. The way they are processed allows for them to have not only a light hue but also a smooth surface. Some companies seek to give their product a luxurious, high-end look, with a sleek design to keep their branding on point. A strong material with elastic properties is then required to accomplish this, therefore calling on the virgin paperboard.

However, there is another side to this coin. What if brand presentation is not what your company focuses on, but rather the ethical usage of material instead?  Recycled paperboard is made from fibers that are derived from paper that is re-puled. The fibers therefore have a tendency to be weaker as they are over processed. Because the fibers are recycled, impure material, such as dyes or inks, can sometimes be found in this type of paperboard. However, the surface can be coated to hide these colors. Therefore, if you are looking for a material with an environmental impact, recycled paperboard is what you should consider.

It might be difficult to crown a winner in this battle between virgin and recycled paperboard, as it depends of the message you are trying to express about the brand through the packaging. And it doesn’t end there! There are several types of paperboard out there to choose from depending on what industry you are in. At Netpak, we have several options for you to choose from. We realize that it can get overwhelming to choose what is best for your product and that is why we can help advise you on the choice to make. It is important to note that we source the paperboard we use from global sources.

With the vision in mind for your brand and the knowledge on the types of paperboard available for you, there is no winner or loser in this battle between the yin and yang of the paper industry. It’s a tie!

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

Printed sleeves: A way to spice up your packaging

They say don’t judge a book by its cover, but can you judge a product by its packaging? In this day and age, shelves get saturated with products. It’s up to you, the manufacturer, to find ways to set your brand apart from the rest. One of the ways to do this could very well be staring you in the face: it’s time to revamp your packaging. This might seem like a tedious and expensive endeavour. However, it doesn’t have to be when you can use printed sleeves.

A customized printed sleeve is an extra packaging technique that wraps or covers your product, while still allowing you to add elements that will make your brand stand out, and ultimately attract your customer. This method is not only used to spruce up your current packaging, but also to brand your holiday or seasonal pack, showcase promotions, or package specials. Whatever the case may be, you can increase your product’s shelf appeal and add a little zing to your packaging.

There are several options to choose from depending on your visual needs. What is referred to as a paperboard sleeve is usually the most affordable and is a great way to dress up your package. With this, the product itself is still visible so the brand is still recognizable. You can let your ingenuity take over by incorporating custom shapes and giving your product a unique look. Another option to spruce up your sleeve is the use of cutouts. As the name implies, these allow your logo to be seen, and any important aspect of the product to be visible to the customer. Therefore, there are many ways to impact your customer and set your brand apart from all the rest when using printed sleeves.

At Netpak, we are all about raising your brand’s shelf esteem. We recognize that elevating your brand to new heights is key and that bands or sleeves can be a cost-effective way of doing so. We have the ability to create printed sleeves, customized to your liking, for your product. Because we know and are familiar with the different industry packaging standards and requirements out there, we not only create sleeves for boxes but also for such things as bottles, beverage holders, etc.  With our team of experts, we are here to stimulate you with new ideas that showcase the uniqueness of your product.

So, roll up your sleeves, let your creativity come through, and take your brand to the next level!

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

It’s all in the details: Specifications in printing

Rules and regulations are everywhere, even in the projects we seek to accomplish. From the beginning to the end of the packaging process, there are guidelines that need to be followed and respected in order to ensure that projects are completed correctly. These set of requirements are called specifications or specs. It should come therefore as no surprise that there are as many of types of specifications as there are steps in the packaging creation. In order to minimize any confusion, let us start at the very beginning with print specifications.

When it comes to printing, specs are crucial in order to ensure that what is asked for from the customers is delivered to press properly. Having been in the business for many years now, we have a checklist of specs that we stick to, ensuring we deliver the highest quality print to our customer.

  • Bleed specifications

Don’t worry, no Band-Aids or stiches are needed for this! When images or designs touch the edge of a page and go beyond the trim line, leaving no white margin, this is referred to as a bleed. It’s therefore the area that will be trimmed off. In order to ensure that no misalignments or inconsistencies affect the final print, a bleed is set in place and serves as a safety zone for the printer. At Netpak, we require that all design files submitted for printing include a bleed. Better safe than sorry!

  • Type and type size requirements: general guideline for font thickness

Another specification that is important when it comes to printing focuses on size and type of font used. With a vast array of fonts in existence, each of different size, requirements are set in place to make sure that the final text in the design is legible when printed. Every word counts and size does matter when it comes to a quality print project.

  • Image resolution

If a picture is worth a thousand words, how much is a hi-res image worth? It’s truly priceless. There is nothing worse than having a hyper-pixelated or blurry printed image on a final design. To avoid poor quality printing, it is usually recommended that images submitted be 300 DPI (300 pixels per inch or dots per inch) or more. A higher DPI produces a clearer printed image.

  • CMYK

A term that you might see often when looking at print specifications is CMYK. This stands for Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black and is thecolor profile used in print. Without throwing printing jargon at you, in a nutshell, images printed using CMYK use layers of dots and utilize a wider range of colors.

These are a few of the print specifications that are covered and expected when submitting your artwork files. As you move through the steps of the packaging process, from material to finish to product, more requirements are expected at every stage. This can quickly be very overwhelming and daunting as specifications are different depending on the industry you are in. At Netpak, our prepress department verifies your files for these specs and ensures, whether you are in the health and beauty industry or in the food industry, everything is according to standards for a high-quality print and a “spec”tacular final product.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

Plastic Pollution: It’s the Last Straw

Canada: The True North, Strong and, soon to be, Plastic-Free. It has been announced that by 2021, Canada will ban single use plastics. As the name implies, single-use plastics are defined as “items intended to be used only once before they are thrown away or recycled.” However, this still leaves room for confusion. There remains a grey zone in what constitutes a single use plastic and what items won’t make the cut. We suspect that items like plastic straws, polystyrene, plastic bags, cutlery, takeout containers and plastic bottles, are just a few of the everyday elements that will soon be banned.

Nevertheless, this new injunction will undoubtedly impact the food service industry. Whether it’s at the coffee shop or in a grocery store, plastic and polystyrene have played a large role in most types of businesses. What will the food service landscape look like? For larger food franchises, this will be an easier and more affordable transition, as long as the materials needed are readily available for packaging. However, for smaller business owners, this might be more challenging than expected, especially from a financial standpoint. Even though it’s clear that conversations are still needed regarding this topic, the wheels have already been put in motion for some commercial entities as we move towards more sustainable packaging for products.

Sustainable packaging isn’t a complicated concept to understand, but it’s still complex to execute. There are many factors that come into play as it’s not only about recycling anymore. The complete life cycle of a package is just as important as the end stages. From the raw materials that are used to create a package, to the disposal of it, every step in the process is now evaluated for sustainability. A new wave of eco-innovation, based on a demand for sustainability at both the manufacturer and the consumer level, has forced both brand owners and packaging producers to now think outside the box, quite literally!

At Netpak, our commitment to developing sustainable options from the beginning of the packaging process to the end is ongoing. Every day, we strive to work efficiently, by reducing waste, resources and energy, while still delivering the highest caliber product to our customers. Our efforts have been rewarded as we have received several “Eco-Responsible” certifications, from The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFIâ) to The Forest Stewardship Council (FSCâ); we keep the wellness of the environment at the heart of what we do and how we do it.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

Follow the Green Brick Road to Sustainable Packaging

“Going green” is an expression that seems to be everywhere. As the environmental landscape is changing, people are becoming more conscious of the choices they make and how these options have a long-term impact on the environment. However, it’s not only about going green anymore. It’s about staying green, especially in the packaging industry.

Sustainable packaging: what is it?

Packaging usually involves quite a bit of waste and that’s why more businesses are looking for an eco-friendly alternative. Sustainable packaging might sound like an oxymoron, but it refers to the creation and use of packaging that improves sustainability. Its life cycle is thoroughly assessed from beginning to end to ensure that every step of the process involves sustainable procedures. From the source of the material being used, to the procedures and technology used to manufacture it, the aim is to decrease the impact that waste has on the environment and reduce ecological footprint. These proactive initiatives trickle down the chain and affect both the consumer and the product itself.

Sustainable packaging and the consumer

Consumers’ shopping habits are evolving. Once quality and affordability were the only criteria that mattered, now sustainable packaging plays a big role in the consumer’s purchasing decision. They have become more conscious of the waste process and are even willing to pay extra for a product that has a positive impact on the environment. Industries across the board, such as food, cosmetics and even clothing, have therefore had to listen to the consumer’s needs. It has been recently shown that sustainable packaging has become one of the main purchasing drivers. All this has therefore forced companies and businesses to re-evaluate their packaging strategies. They not only have to take into account cost and convenience, but also incorporate their customers’ values into their own business model. This ongoing approach will set your company apart in a competitive market.

Sustainable packaging and the product

So how should you as a company begin to look at this sustainability concept and adapt it to your product? There are 4 facets to consider:

  1. What materials are used;
  2. How are they produced;
  3. How is the product shipped;
  4. How the materials are disposed by the consumer.

Using paper instead of plastic would be the first step in the right direction. Paper is made from fibers that can easily be recycled. You can even use plant-based packaging as this has become very popular in the last few years.

Look for a packaging company like Netpak that uses sustainable materials every day and makes environmentally friendly choices from the beginning to the end of the packaging lifecycle.

Try to ship products in packages that are not too big, where a lot of void fill is required. Opting for materials that are sized to fit would be best.

Make sure your product is recyclable or reusable and share that information with the consumer.

Sustainable packaging: stamp of approval

As we move towards a more environmentally conscious tomorrow, we will have to make crucial packaging changes and opt towards long term sustainability. Luckily, there are several options to choose from when it comes to your product. Netpak operates responsibly as it shares the same values as its customers when it comes to the environment. Its continuous commitment to sustainability and its certifications allows it to pave the road towards a greener future. Learn more about Netpak’s eco-friendly designations here.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

Packaging 101 – The terms you need to know

When looking for the ideal way to package a product or a project, it can quickly be overwhelming. Terms and lingo are used that you are not always familiar with, causing even more confusion. You can rapidly resort to choosing something that is not quite what you had in mind, leaving you disappointed and unsatisfied. If only there were a way to know what each packaging term meant before the point of no return. Now there is!  A quick glossary of the most common packaging terms and techniques can help any beginner navigate through the packaging dictionary to find the best solution for their project needs. There is no need to be the new kid on the block any longer!

  • Dieline/Diecut

As a customer, you might be looking to get a package printed a certain way. This is where dielines come into play. Think of a dieline as a cookie cutter, it serves as a package template that guarantees an accurate layout for a printed product. It would therefore illustrate where the folds and cut lines would be in a flattened format.

  • Enhanced printing

You are perhaps looking to take your packaging to the next level and really make it stand out. Our team of experts can help you enhance the printing with several techniques such as hot stamping, metallic ink, embossing etc. and let your creativity speak for itself.

  • Lamination

The word lamination is most commonly used in the printing industry. It refers to the process of enclosing and bonding printed material between two pieces of plastic film. This technique is used to protect a printed piece from any damage such as stains, moisture or wrinkles. This inevitably leads to durability and strength of the print, at a reasonable cost over time. Let your printed project stand out and seal the deal.

  • Lot/SKU

All inventory needs to be identified to minimize any confusion or error. SKU stands for Stock Keeping Unit and refers to the identification code relating to an individual product. On the other hand, a lot number is a number given to a group of products that have common characteristics such as material or manufacturing location.

  • Mock-ups 

Is the suspense getting to you? Do you just want to know what a finished package will look like before it goes to print? This is where mock-ups come in handy. A mock-up is a realistic representation of what the product will look like. It is a visual aid to help you envision what the final result will be.

 

  • Paperboard 

Thicker than paper, paperboard is a paper-based material that is more rigid and foldable. It is still considered to be lightweight and easy to cut regardless of its thickness. Typically used to package products, paperboard is available in different grades depending on your packaging needs. From Solid Bleached Sulfate to Corrugated Fiberboard, Netpak offers an array of paperboards to choose from.

  • Paperboard Gauge

Thickness is a crucial property of paperboard as a variation in it can have an effect on such things as the permeability or stiffness of the finished package. The paperboard gauge is a thickness tester that measures the width of paper and cardboard and is widely used in the packaging industry.

  • Specs (Specifications)

Let’s be specific! Specs or specifications define parameters used by the customer to verify the product of a supplier upon delivery. It is essentially a statement relating to the materials, dimensions, etc. of the package being built.

  • Varnish

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but also in the hands of varnish. A varnish is a thin-protective layer that is applied to a printed project for protection or esthetic purposes. It enriches the visual appearance of the print or package, as it increases the perceived quality of the project. There are several types of varnishes available and are usually an affordable means to enhance the beauty of your package.

So, if you are new to the world of packaging, you don’t have to worry about learning a new language. With the right service and the knowledge of the industry lingo, you will be speaking like one of our own in no time.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

 

How to choose the right coating or lamination for your packaging

The folding carton and printing industry is flooded with coating and lamination options. These print coatings can help your packaging stand out from its competition by providing a unique texture, making them more durable and elegant. There are many different options available today ranging from standard to speciality finishes that can be applied to the full packaging or to selected spots. Our team of industry experts will help you select the best type of lamination or coating available for your project.

Lamination

This is the ideal finish for paperboard boxes, although it can be costly compared to other options because of its protective properties, such as moisture protection. If your product has to stay in storage for some time, lamination could be the way to go for your packaging finish.

There are various types of laminations available at Netpak, including the three most popular: gloss, matte and soft touch lamination. The most common gloss lamination offers a clear and lustrous finish to enhance the look of your packaging and intensifies its color. Matte lamination, often chosen over gloss in luxury products, offers a minimalist and elegant look, while soft touch offers all the benefits of matte lamination while giving your packaging a velvety, brushed-hand feel. Learn more about the different types of laminations Netpak offers here.

Aqueous (AQ) Coating

Commonly used as a cost-effective solution, AQ coating is used to protect printed pieces by providing a gloss or matter surface that deters dirt and fingerprints. AQ coating is water-based and food safe, making it the ideal sustainable solution for the food and beverage industry. Netpak’s team of experts is well-versed in the rules and regulations of the food and beverage industry, allowing us to suggest and provide the most cost-effective and best-suited solutions for your packaging. Learn more about Netpak’s highly-coveted certifications here.

Ultraviolet (UV) Coating

Ultraviolet coatings, commonly called UV coating, provides a glossy finish that is often compared to a gloss lamination. Though similar and eco-friendlier, UV coating is not as strong and does not protect your packaging as lamination would. UV is a cost-effective solution and quick to produce if you’re on a budget and in a time crunch.

Varnish & No-Coating

Varnishes can be another option for smaller budgets. It is basically a clear ink available in gloss, satin or matte. Digital printing is great for efficiency, fast turnarounds and lower per unit cost. Meanwhile, when the packaging is mostly used for shipping and transportation, embellishments and expensive coating are typically not required, which results in no coating.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544