Skip to main content
Designing Folding Cartons for EPR | Netpak Packaging

Designing Folding Cartons for EPR – Practical Engineering Levers That Reduce Reporting Complexity

Written by Niko Yudin on . Posted in Folding carton, Food & Beverage, Health & Beauty, Innovation, Markets, Packaging, Sustainability. No Comments on Designing Folding Cartons for EPR – Practical Engineering Levers That Reduce Reporting Complexity

Designing Folding Cartons for EPR


Designing Folding Cartons for EPR

Practical Engineering Levers That Reduce Reporting Complexity

EPR packaging programs reward clarity and punish ambiguity. If your folding carton design creates hidden components,
inconsistent weights, or uncontrolled variants, your packaging material reporting requirements get harder,
and your exposure to eco-modulated fees rises. This guide explains how to engineer
design for EPR packaging so your folding carton recyclability design stays simple to report, easy to verify, and cheaper to administer.
1,
2
Updated for 2026 operating reality in North America and Europe. Sources include Sustainable Packaging Coalition and government EPR reporting guidance.
1,
3

This Article at a Glance

  • Design for EPR packaging starts with stable, component-level bills of materials and verified weights.
  • Folding carton recyclability design improves when windows, laminations, and inserts are minimized or tightly controlled.
  • Packaging material reporting requirements depend on weight-by-material discipline, not assumptions.
  • Reducing material variety and preventing spec drift lowers administrative burden and audit risk.
  • The most reliable way to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure is to simplify structure before it becomes a reporting exception.

If your carton architecture is controlled, your reporting becomes predictable.

What EPR Changes for Folding Cartons

EPR shifts packaging decisions into reporting discipline. Your folding carton is no longer “paperboard packaging.”
It is a set of components, weights, and classifications that must stay stable across SKUs, plants, and suppliers.

Most EPR programs require obligated companies to join a producer responsibility organization, report packaging data, and pay fees that scale with the packaging they supply into market.
When fees are eco-modulated, recyclability and design choices can increase or decrease what you pay.
2,
1

For compliance teams, packaging material reporting requirements are fundamentally weight and material based. Government reporting guidance is explicit: report the weight of individual materials, and treat multi-material and composite structures as a classification problem that must be consistently applied.
3

That is why folding carton recyclability design is also a data design problem.
The easiest way to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure is to remove avoidable complexity before it becomes a reporting exception you manage forever.
4

Define the objective: fewer exceptions, cleaner reporting

If your packaging program has thousands of SKUs, EPR does not fail because you lack good intent.
It fails because small packaging changes accumulate. Windows change, coatings change, weights drift, vendors substitute.
Over time, you lose a defensible packaging bill of materials, and your reports become estimates.

The engineering goal is clear. Use design for EPR packaging to keep carton structures classifiable, separable, and measurable.
This is the fastest path to lower administrative burden and better fee forecasting.


Practical Engineering Levers for EPR-Ready Folding Cartons

These are the carton design variables that most often create reporting exceptions. Fix them at the structural level,
and your packaging material reporting requirements become repeatable.

EPR reporting is simplest when a folding carton is predominantly fiber and the non-fiber elements are either minimal, separable, or consistently specified.
Design-for-recycling guidance for paper and paperboard highlights the same theme across markets, reduce problematic combinations, limit non-paper components, and avoid structures that break pulping or screening performance.
5,
6

If your goal is to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure, the same levers also influence eco-modulated fee outcomes where recyclability and material choices are scored or priced differently.
1

Lever 1: Windows

Windowed cartons: design for separation and documentation

A plastic window turns “paperboard packaging” into a multi-component structure. That is not automatically non-compliant.
It becomes a reporting problem when the window film and adhesive are not tracked as explicit components.

  • Keep windows as small as performance allows.
  • Prefer designs where the window is removable or clearly separable at end-of-life.
  • Specify film type, gauge, and adhesive in the packaging bill of materials.

Composite classification rules and thresholds vary by jurisdiction. Government reporting guidance shows how small plastic fractions can change how fiber-based packs are classified and reported.
3

Lever 2: Laminations

Lamination control: avoid permanent multi-layer stacks

Laminations and barrier films can degrade fiber recoverability and create “what exactly is this” reporting debates.
Paper recyclability guidance flags certain coatings and laminated structures as conditional or limited compatibility,
depending on composition and local processing capability.
6

  • Use coatings aligned with fiber recovery where barrier performance allows.
  • If a laminate is required, lock material spec and thickness, then treat it as a permanent reportable component.
  • Avoid unannounced vendor substitutions, especially for “equivalent” films.

The reporting risk is often not the laminate itself, it is uncontrolled variation across SKUs and suppliers.

Lever 3: Material variety

Reduce component count and material variety

Every extra material, insert, liner, or coating increases classification work and verification time.
Design guidance for paper and paperboard emphasizes limiting non-paper components that can disrupt recycling operations.
5

  • Eliminate rigid inserts where paperboard engineering can replace them.
  • Standardize board grades across size families.
  • Keep adhesives and coatings consistent across the platform.
Lever 4: Weight

Lightweight without creating fragility exceptions

Fee calculations often scale with reported weight. Even when a program does not publish fee mechanics publicly, internal cost allocation usually tracks mass by material.
Lightweighting is only useful if it is controlled and documented, otherwise weights drift and reporting credibility falls.

  • Right-size cartons to reduce void and unnecessary board area.
  • Optimize caliper based on compression and distribution needs.
  • Use consistent conversion specs so weights stay stable over time.

EPR guidance consistently frames reporting as weight-by-material discipline, not estimates.
3

Lever 5: Eco-modulation

Engineer toward lower-fee outcomes where eco-modulation applies

Eco-modulation adjusts producer fees based on packaging attributes such as recyclability and other performance factors.
That means design decisions can change your fee position, not just your sustainability narrative.
1,
4

  • Prefer fiber-forward solutions with minimal non-fiber add-ons.
  • Document rationale for any non-fiber component that remains.
  • Keep the platform stable so performance claims and reporting stay defensible.

Quick diagnostic: where reporting breaks first

  • “Same carton” across SKUs, but different calipers, coatings, or windows.
  • A barrier film is added for shelf life, but the BOM and weights never update.
  • Artwork teams approve a new finish, and compliance never sees it.
  • Multiple suppliers produce “equivalent” cartons with different materials.

The fix is not a spreadsheet heroics cycle. The fix is controlled carton engineering and controlled data.


Data Structure and Audit Readiness for EPR Packaging

EPR compliance work accelerates when packaging data is SKU-based, component-based, and version-controlled.
That is how you turn folding carton packaging into report-ready material supply data.

Most EPR regimes converge on the same operational requirement, report packaging by material and weight, then maintain evidence that supports what you submitted.
Government guidance is explicit about weight-by-material reporting and how to treat composite and multi-material packaging in submissions.
3

In the United States, EPR packaging programs are moving from concept into compliance cycles across multiple states. That increases multi-jurisdiction complexity and raises the value of a single packaging system of record.
7

1

Build a packaging bill of materials that matches reality

Treat each folding carton as a component structure, paperboard, coatings, window film, adhesives, inserts.
The BOM should reflect what is physically supplied, not what the template spec says.
EPR reporting guidance repeatedly ties compliance to material and weight discipline.
3

Outcome: fewer classification debates and fewer “unknown material” exceptions.

2

Store weights at the component level, then roll up

If a carton has a window, you need the paperboard weight and the window weight.
Some EPR guidance examples show this pattern across materials, each material weight rolls into its category for reporting.
4

Outcome: better fee modeling and cleaner verification support.

3

Apply change control to packaging, like you would to a formula

When a coating, laminate, board grade, or window film changes, your EPR reporting should update with it.
Multi-state and multi-market timelines make “silent packaging drift” more expensive to correct later.
7

Outcome: defensible audit trails and fewer retroactive data fixes.

Lower reporting complexity

Controlled carton platform

  • Fewer board grades across the range
  • Coatings standardized by category
  • Window use limited and consistently specified
  • Weights verified and version-controlled

This structure makes design for EPR packaging operational. Your folding carton recyclability design stays stable,
and your packaging material reporting requirements become repeatable.

Higher reporting complexity

Exception-driven carton portfolio

  • Multiple finishes chosen SKU by SKU with no governance
  • Window films substituted by vendor availability
  • Weights guessed or copied from legacy specs
  • No linkage between artwork approvals and BOM updates

This is where teams lose audit readiness, and where fee exposure becomes unpredictable when eco-modulation applies.
1

Where Netpak fits: engineering plus documentation

Netpak manufactures custom folding cartons and windowed boxes, and supports structural design, prepress, printing, finishing, and logistics.
That matters for EPR because a controlled packaging supplier can keep structures stable and documentation consistent across runs and variants.
8,
9

  • Structure and prepress discipline: CAD, prototyping, and dieline control to reduce uncontrolled variation.9
  • Material transparency: board selection, windowing options, coatings, and finishing captured in specs.8
  • Quote inputs that match reporting needs: cartons priced around specs, volumes, and timelines, with clear material and finishing definitions that support internal reporting workflows.9

If your goal is to reduce EPR fees packaging exposure and reporting labor, start by stabilizing carton architecture and packaging data in the same project.



Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions from packaging engineers and compliance leaders aligning folding carton programs with EPR reporting.

What does EPR reporting require for folding cartons?

EPR programs generally require producers to report packaging supplied by material category and weight. That creates a downstream need for
SKU-level bills of materials, controlled component weights, and documented material classifications. Ontario’s Blue Box program, for example,
requires producers to register and report supply data by defined material categories.
1,
2

For folding cartons, reporting failures usually come from undocumented windows, laminations, coating changes, or outdated weight assumptions.

Do windows and laminations affect recyclability reporting?

They can. Recyclability guidance for paper packaging cautions against composite structures that are difficult to separate in fiber recovery systems.
Even when a carton is predominantly paperboard, window films, barrier layers, and laminations often require explicit tracking and classification
within your packaging material reporting requirements.
3

How do you reduce EPR fees through folding carton design?

While fee structures differ by jurisdiction, common levers include reducing total material weight supplied, improving recyclability alignment,
and simplifying multi-material structures. EPR resources consistently link packaging reduction and recyclability improvements to lower cost exposure.
4

Practically, that means fiber-forward design, minimized non-fiber components, standardized board grades, and verified component weights.

What does “audit ready” packaging data look like?

Audit-ready packaging data is version-controlled, traceable to specifications, and aligned to what is physically supplied.
It includes a SKU-linked bill of materials, documented material categories, and current component weights. Supply reporting guidance emphasizes
weight-by-material discipline, which increases the importance of packaging data governance.
2

Request an EPR-Ready Folding Carton Quote

If you are redesigning folding cartons to reduce reporting complexity, send Netpak your dielines,
board grades, finishing specifications, window details, and annual volumes by SKU.
We will respond with structured engineering options that support clean packaging material reporting requirements and audit readiness.


Request a Quote

Prefer email, send SKU specs and timelines to
sales@netpak.com.

References


  1. Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority, Blue Box Producers.

  2. RPRA, Blue Box Registry and Supply Reporting Producer Guide (v1.3).

  3. Confederation of Paper Industries, Recyclability Guidelines 2024.

  4. EcoEnclose, EPR Packaging Requirements overview.


Continue reading

Canada Front of Package Nutrition Symbol 2026- Compliance Strategy for Folding Carton Food Packaging google preview

Canada Front of Package Nutrition Symbol 2026: Compliance Strategy for Folding Carton Food Packaging

Written by Niko Yudin on . Posted in Education, Folding carton, Food & Beverage, Markets, Packaging. No Comments on Canada Front of Package Nutrition Symbol 2026: Compliance Strategy for Folding Carton Food Packaging


Canada Front of Package
Nutrition Symbol 2026

Compliance Strategy for Folding Carton Food Packaging

Canada’s front of package nutrition symbol is mandatory for many prepackaged foods sold in Canada.
As of January 1, 2026, CFIA enforces compliance for foods imported, manufactured in Canada, or packaged at retail on or after that date.1

If you manage food packaging in folding cartons, this regulation affects your principal display panel, artwork approvals, and production planning.
The Canada FOP nutrition symbol is not a minor label update.
It changes front panel hierarchy, bilingual layout structure, and compliance governance.2

Food brands searching for Canada front of package nutrition symbol requirements, FOP nutrition symbol Canada 2026 enforcement,
or folding carton packaging compliance Canada need implementation clarity.

This article outlines what the regulation requires, where packaging programs fail, and how a folding carton partner such as Netpak supports structured compliance.

What CFIA will enforce.
Foods imported, manufactured in Canada, or packaged at retail on or after January 1, 2026 must comply.
Foods imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail before that date may continue to be sold under sell through provisions.
Your compliance trigger is the production and packaging date, not the retail sell through date.1

What the Official Canada FOP Nutrition Symbol Looks Like

Health Canada prescribes standardized black and white symbols. You must use official artwork formats and follow the presentation rules.2

High in Saturated Fat, Sugars, Sodium

FOP symbol high in saturated fat, sugars, sodium
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

High in Sodium

FOP symbol high in sodium
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

High in Saturated Fat and Sugars

FOP symbol high in saturated fat and sugars
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

High in Saturated Fat

FOP symbol high in saturated fat
Official example from Health Canada guidance.

Core presentation requirements that affect folding cartons

  • English and French text, using the official formats and language rules.2
  • Minimum size based on principal display surface area, using Health Canada size tables, not estimates.2
  • Required clear space around the symbol, treated as a locked zone in dielines.2
  • Placement in the upper half of the principal display panel, generally on the right half when the panel is wider than tall, consistent with Health Canada examples.2

From a folding carton perspective, these requirements affect dieline design. If your front panel is built around dense branding or multiple callouts, symbol integration often requires structural adjustment.

When the Canada Front of Package Nutrition Symbol Is Required

Health Canada sets nutrient thresholds based on percent Daily Value for saturated fat, sugars, and sodium.
Trigger logic depends on reference amount and category rules in the guidance.2

Most foods

Reference amount greater than 30 g or 30 mL.

Symbol required at 15 percent Daily Value or more.

Small reference amounts

30 g or 30 mL or less.

Symbol required at 10 percent Daily Value or more.

Main dishes

Reference amount 200 g or more for children and adults, or 170 g or more for products only for children 1 to 4, under the guidance criteria.

Symbol required at 30 percent Daily Value or more.

What goes wrong in real portfolios

You must assess each nutrient independently. If one nutrient meets or exceeds the threshold, the symbol is required.2

  • Incorrect reference amount classification across a SKU family.
  • Misinterpretation of main dish criteria across multi component products.
  • Failure to reassess after reformulation, especially sodium creep.
  • Overlooking 10 percent Daily Value triggers for small reference amounts.

Example. A 26 g snack with sodium at 11 percent Daily Value triggers the symbol under the 10 percent rule.
If your previous formula was 9 percent Daily Value and the carton had no symbol, a minor reformulation forces a front panel redesign.2

Treat FOP as a controlled change, not a one time artwork update.

January 1, 2026 Enforcement and Production Risk

CFIA ties compliance to when food is imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail. Sell through depends on the production side date, not the retail date.1

Three exposure scenarios for folding cartons

  • Cartons printed before 2026 but filled in 2026.
  • Co packers holding legacy packaging inventory beyond the year boundary.
  • Reformulated SKUs produced in 2026 without updated artwork and dielines.

If a product packaged in 2026 exceeds thresholds and the carton lacks the required symbol, corrective action follows CFIA enforcement.1

How to prevent carton scrap and line disruption

Treat the carton as a controlled component. Track three dates per SKU.

  • Artwork release date.
  • Print and delivery date.
  • First fill date.

Reverse schedule from the first fill date. Segregate legacy inventory. Require written changeover acceptance from co packers.

Structural Implications for Folding Carton Programs

The front of package symbol affects more than graphics. It affects the packaging system, not only the layout file.

What changes in a well run carton system

  • Front panel hierarchy becomes a template decision.
  • Multi SKU family alignment reduces repeated redesign across flavours and sizes.
  • Bilingual layout spacing becomes a structural rule.
  • Club pack principal display panels need consistent placement logic across faces.
  • Prepress QC includes symbol size, clear space, and orientation checks.
  • Inventory and print run forecasting aligns to first fill dates under CFIA date logic.1

Where programs fail

Decentralized SKU governance increases scrap and relabelling costs because thresholds and artwork changes do not move together.
Compliance needs repeatable control across functions.

  • Regulatory and R and D update nutrition data, packaging does not receive an automatic trigger review.
  • Design locks front panels without a reserved symbol zone.
  • Operations prints to forecast without tying cartons to first fill dates.
  • Co packers run legacy cartons in 2026 because the changeover plan is informal.

Placement examples, use these early in dieline planning

Wide PDP placement example
Wide principal display panel example from Health Canada guidance. Placement is shown within the upper half and typically in the right half when the panel is wider than tall.2

Tall PDP example

Tall PDP placement example

Upper half placement example from Health Canada guidance.2

Vertical symbol example

Vertical symbol example

Vertical orientation example from Health Canada guidance.2

Language and Display Options

The symbol has English, French, and bilingual format rules. Decide your approach early so the rule stays consistent across SKUs and faces.2

Bilingual symbol example

English first bilingual symbol example

English first bilingual example from Health Canada guidance.2

Bilingual symbol example

French first bilingual symbol example

French first bilingual example from Health Canada guidance.2

Health Canada allows equal principal display panels to carry language specific symbols on the matching language face in certain cases.
Plan this choice early because it affects hierarchy, spacing, and SKU family consistency.2

How Netpak Supports Folding Carton Compliance

Netpak approaches Canada FOP compliance as an integrated packaging governance process. The goal is repeatable execution across SKUs.
You reduce scrap, stabilize launch timelines, and keep artwork systems under control.

SKU level trigger validation

We confirm reference amounts and document trigger logic for saturated fat, sugars, and sodium per SKU, using Health Canada guidance as the baseline.2

Output: a SKU trigger map tied to your nutrition facts inputs.

Dieline and front panel assessment

We validate symbol size, clear space, and placement against your principal display panel geometry. We adjust dielines and layouts before art lock.2

Output: dieline impact notes with placement checks.

Reformulation risk mapping

We flag SKUs near threshold boundaries where a small nutrient shift changes symbol requirements. We prioritize items near 15 and 10 percent Daily Value triggers.2

Output: a risk band list for governance and planning.

Production cutover planning

We tie cartons to first fill dates and build a cutover plan aligned to CFIA’s enforcement trigger. This limits obsolete inventory and line disruption in 2026.1

Output: a cutover plan by SKU and facility.

Prepress compliance integration

We integrate symbol verification into artwork approvals, including size table checks, clear space locks, bilingual format control, and placement validation.2

Output: a repeatable prepress checklist for your team.

Quote and timeline inputs

We scope quickly when you share SKUs, current dielines, principal display panel dimensions, and first 2026 fill dates. Co packer sites and changeover dates tighten planning.1

Output: a scoped timeline and quote inputs checklist.

Sticker Labels, Assortments, and Front Panel Claim Guardrails

In store labels and assortment packs add operational complexity.
Front panel claims also face restrictions when the same nutrient appears in the symbol.
Treat these as separate workflow checkpoints in your packaging system.2

Scale label sticker example

Scale label sticker example

Sticker placement example from Health Canada guidance. Use adhesive that survives distribution and retail handling.2

Assortment pack example

Assortment pack example

Assortment example from Health Canada guidance. Decide whether one symbol applies across flavours or if the pack needs more than one presentation.2

Same nutrient claims

If a nutrient appears in the symbol, review whether front panel claims for that nutrient are restricted under the guidance.
Validate claim eligibility before you lock your front panel copy.2

Visibility and contrast

Keep the symbol high contrast and unobscured. Treat clear space as a locked zone in your dielines so brand elements do not creep into the buffer.2

Look alike seal risk

Avoid front panel marks that mimic the symbol’s structure. Treat this as a governance standard across agencies and co manufacturers.2

Download Official Specifications and Formats

Use Health Canada’s official files to avoid sizing, spacing, and language errors.
Treat these as your single source for symbol artwork and tables.2

Download the Directory of Specifications and Compendium of Formats from Health Canada’s front of package nutrition labelling resources.
Use these files in prepress to confirm minimum size and placement rules before plates are made.2

FAQ

These are common operational questions from packaging teams managing multiple SKUs and co packer sites.

Does every food product require the Canada front of package nutrition symbol?

No. The symbol is required when saturated fat, sugars, or sodium meet or exceed Health Canada’s percent Daily Value thresholds.
Assess each nutrient independently using the product’s reference amount and the guidance criteria.2

Are there exemptions or cases where the symbol is prohibited?

Yes. Health Canada defines category based exemptions and situations where the symbol is prohibited.
Confirm category conditions before you lock artwork, especially for products with specialized regulatory status.2

If my product was manufactured in December 2025 but sold in 2026, does it need the symbol?

CFIA ties compliance to foods imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail on or after January 1, 2026.
Foods imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail before that date may continue to be sold.
The key date is the production and packaging side date, not the retail sell through date.1

If I reformulate in 2026 and cross a nutrient threshold, do I need new cartons immediately?

Yes. If the reformulated product exceeds a threshold and is imported, manufactured, or packaged at retail on or after January 1, 2026, the required symbol must appear.
Align nutrition change control with carton artwork updates so the change reaches the line before the first fill date.12

How is minimum size determined for the symbol on a folding carton?

Minimum size is tied to the principal display surface area. Health Canada provides tables and format rules in the guide and related files.
For folding cartons, confirm the PDP geometry on the dieline, then apply the official size table before prepress release.2

What should I send Netpak to request a quote?

Share your SKU list, nutrition facts data, reference amounts, current dielines, principal display panel dimensions, and first fill dates by facility.
If applicable, include co packer sites and planned changeover timing.1

Request a Folding Carton FOP Quote

If you manage multiple SKUs and need support aligning folding carton artwork and production planning with Canada’s FOP nutrition symbol requirements, use the form below to request a quote.


Request a quote

References
  1. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Nutrition labelling regulations and transition details for front of package nutrition symbol.
  2. Health Canada. Front of package nutrition symbol labelling guide for industry, specifications, formats, placement examples, exemptions, and restrictions.


Continue reading

Making natural packaging great again

Written by jeansebastienricher on . Posted in Education, Markets, Trends.

We’ve all heard the expression “what really matters is invisible to the eyes.” This holds true even when it comes to product packaging. The way you market your brand through your packaging is the first step. With the rising concern for the environment and the growing need for sustainability, the natural approach can make packaging great again. Here are a few reasons why:

  • Shielding your product

No one wants a product that has been exposed to outside contaminants. Packaging forms a wall to help protect the product and also avoid any spoilage. This is particularly important for products that can go bad more quickly or foods with ingredients that have been omitted for health reasons. Whatever the case may be, packaging is a must to protect the product.

  • Increasing durability

Preservative-free is usually the best way to go when it comes to food. Alas, that means that certain products might therefore have a shorter lifespan. That’s where the right packaging can come to the rescue. It can help preserve the product by creating the appropriate atmosphere for it. Each product needs certain conditions in order for it to last on shelf. Luckily, there are packaging options that are now able to mimic the environment a product needs to be in to optimize its shelf life.

  • Brand yourself

The way a package looks on shelf can speak volumes about your brand. Before any sales force or representative, the packaging itself is what the consumer first sees and what creates the initial attraction. Therefore, optimize your packaging so that the brand message is conveyed with just one look. Don’t sell yourself or your brand short!

  • Easy, breezy solutions

We all lead busy lives and are always appreciative of convenience, even when it comes to products we see on the shelf. We can’t deny that we’ve all reached for the product with either tear notches or zipper closures; basically, a package with no extra bells or whistles to figure out. As a consumer, we gravitate towards ease. Therefore, packaging that is a breeze to deal with will most likely be the choice of many customers and what you should aim for when it comes to your brand.

  • Be efficient from start to finish

Time is money as we all know. Making sure that the production portion of the packaging process is operating in an efficient and seamless way is a must. As a brand, ensuring that no waste is generated due to faulty packaging, that resources are available when production begins, and that backorders are avoided as much as possible, are all elements that need to be evaluated. The design and production efficiency of the package go hand in hand.

Netpak can help you create packaging options that take all these criteria into account when designing your natural or organic product package. We ensure that the packaging respects the product’s shelf life by using food-friendly materials.

Therefore, to persuade the consumer of this approach when it comes to product packaging, all these facets are important to the process; it’s only natural.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544

BRC® Certification: Netpak receives its sixth consecutive designation

Written by jeansebastienricher on . Posted in Certification, Education, Markets.

Netpak is proud to announce it has obtained its sixth consecutive BRC® “GRADE AA” certification by GFSI®.

Netpak’s commitment to our customers and continuous process improvement is at the heart of our core values. Being the first North American printer to be accredited with the highly coveted BRC® certification is among one of our many industry achievements and a true testament to our outstanding performance and quality.

What is the BRC® certification?

Setting the standard in the food industry, the British Retail Consortium (BRC®) is a globally recognized organization that establishes a series of standards to help companies be compliant with food safety laws at all levels of the supply chain. Many food manufacturers are now requiring their suppliers to implement rigorous quality control programs and obtain highly-recognized certifications.

The BRC® Global Standards programme is fully approved by the Global Food Standard Initiative (GFSI®) and has become a benchmark in for best practice in the food and beverage industry. Being BRC® certified allows Netpak to validate our production process with the highest standards of quality, safety and traceability in the industry.

What is the BRC® certification process?

Receiving the BRC® designation requires an extremely thorough auditing process, conducted yearly. These formal performance reviews completed at our facility assess the various key components of our production process including our safety and hygiene systems, as well as our control on the manufacturing processes and production line. Risk management systems must be implemented, as well as a rigorous quality control process and upstream and downstream product traceability processes in order to successfully complete the audit and ensure we benchmark against the highest and most demanding standards in the industry.

Years ago, Netpak was among the first in North America to successfully complete the BRC® auditing process and to this day, we have successfully completed this process for the sixth consecutive year.

What does the BRC® certification mean for Netpak?

Obtaining the BRC® designation is of the utmost importance for Netpak. Our customers can rest assured that our facility and packaging solutions meet and achieve the highest levels of the GFSI-recognized certifications for food safety, all while fulfilling their legal obligations and providing protection for the end consumer.

As the industry grows and adds various standards and requirements to meet, Netpak has made a continuous commitment to our customers and our company to maintain these strict standards of quality control, hygiene and food safety. We are proud to be pioneers in the folding carton packaging industry and we will continue to improve our processes to better help our customers and partners achieve their business goals.

Netpak: Printed Folding Carton Experts. Contact us today for a quote: sales@netpak.com | CANADA – USA 1-866-399-8544